The differences that change the choice
Compare the same job across both services. Small source numbers open the official competitor pages we checked.
Swipe to see the full table.
| What to compare |  TransferSize | storage.to |
|---|---|---|
| Free size | 50 GB per file | 25 GB per transfer [1] |
| Free expiry | 1 to 7 days | 1 to 7 days [1] |
| Account to send or download | Not needed for a basic transfer | Not needed for the public transfer [1] |
| Link controls | Password, expiry, and download limits | Password, expiry, and maximum downloads [2] |
| If a browser upload drops | Retries failed parts in the open session | Uses chunks, but its web guide says to add the file again [2] |
| Other apps | Read-only WebDAV on an eligible paid plan | Desktop app, command-line tool, and API [1] |
| Receive or sell | Receive links and paid downloads | The main site focuses on upload, link, and share [1] |
| Main product | A workspace with history, previews, and extra tools | A very simple temporary file transfer [1] |
Apply it to your job
A temporary send or a place to keep working?
Decide whether you only need a short-lived delivery or a workspace you will return to. Compare persistent storage separately from transfer size.
- Temporary delivery lifetime
- Persistent storage allowance
- Tools you need after sending
The first step is almost the same
Both services let you choose files, upload them, and share a link without signing up. Neither asks the person downloading a public transfer to create an account. That makes both useful for a quick one-off handoff.
The free size is the clearest difference
storage.to allows up to 25 GB for free. TransferSize allows a file up to 50 GB. Both free links can expire within one to seven days, so tell the recipient when the link will stop working.
The controls are closer than the homepage suggests
Both services can protect a link with a password, choose an expiry, and cap downloads. TransferSize keeps those controls beside a wider saved workspace; storage.to keeps them inside its smaller temporary-sharing workflow.
Interrupted browser uploads work differently
TransferSize can retry a failed part while its upload session remains open. storage.to also uploads larger browser files in chunks, but its current web guide says that after a dropped connection the partial data is cleaned up and the file should be added again.
Their extra tools serve different users
storage.to offers a desktop app, command-line tool, and API. TransferSize offers read-only WebDAV on eligible plans, plus creator tools and Live Relay. Choose the tools you will use, not the longest feature list.
Questions people ask
Which service has the larger free limit?
TransferSize allows a file up to 50 GB for free. storage.to allows up to 25 GB per free transfer.
Which service is simpler for a one-off link?
storage.to has the smaller, more focused workflow. TransferSize adds a workspace, history, previews, receive links, paid downloads, and other tools, so it does more but has more to learn.
Do I need an account to send or download?
No. Both services allow a basic public transfer without an account for the sender or recipient.
Will storage.to continue an interrupted browser upload?
Its web guide says large files are chunked, but after a dropped connection the partial browser upload is cleaned up and the file should be added again.
How we checked this comparison
TransferSize wrote this page, so it is not an independent review. We checked the competitor's own plan, product, and help pages on 2026-09-01.
- We compare the jobs both services can reasonably handle, even when the products are not identical.
- We say when the other service is the better fit.
- We do not name a speed or quality winner without a repeatable test.
If a fact has changed, email support@transfersize.com with the page and an official source.
Sources
Checked 2026-09-01. Competitor details come from the companies' own pages.
Try the same file with both services before an important send.